« July 2009 | Main | September 2009 »

August 30, 2009

Call for papers: “Wrapping objects”

TAG 2009, Durham 17th -19th December

Abstracts, maximum 200 words including title of paper, name of speaker(s) and institution(s) to be sent to the session organisers by 30th September 2009. Individual papers are expected to specify the contribution they are making to archaeological theory. If you would like to discuss your idea for a paper first, please get in touch with the session organisers:
Susanna Harris, susanna.harris@ucl.ac.uk or Laurence Douny l.douny@ucl.ac.uk

Session Abstract: “Wrapping Objects”

Archaeologists are able to identify objects that have been wrapped, but what is the significance of wrapping? As a cultural and technical act, wrapping may be used to conceal and reveal, camouflage or highlight, transform and exhibit, conserve and preserve. Wrapping and unwrapping objects can be investigated as intentional acts that change the object in a physical, transforming and symbolic process. Existing theories in anthropology suggest ways to investigate the concept of wrapping as a means to imbue objects with powers and life (Gell 1998, 144-54) or to conceal emotion and content (Hendry 1993).

Archaeologists may explore these concepts through wrapping materials and objects that have been wrapped. Wrapping materials such as textiles, skins, fur, clay, leaves, earth, or thin metals have properties and efficacy that act on the objects and people’s perception of them. Objects that are wrapped raise questions of what is being covered or contained and why, as for example in objects wrapped in hoards and burials. We may also consider how surface patterns, architectural structures, conservation processes or writing act as forms of wrapping.

The aim of this session is to explore the theoretical and material implications of wrapping objects in specific times, places and contexts through empirical data.

References

Hendry, Joy. 1993, Wrapping culture: politeness, presentation and power in Japan and other societies, Oxford, Clarendon Press

Gell, Alfred. 1998, The Distributed Person. Art and agency: an anthropological theory, Oxford, Clarendon Press, Ch.7, pp. 96-154


Further conference details can be found at the TAG website:
http://www.dur.ac.uk/tag.2009/

August 28, 2009

Journal of Modern Craft - Online

The Journal of Modern Craft is now in its second year of publication. Its first four issues have already gathered a considerable amount of craft scholarship. The position of craft in modernity has been broadly examined in a wide range of cultures, including Alaska, Britain, Cambodia, China, Cuba, Finland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Japan, Kenya, Slovakia, Sri Lanka and USA. A fifth issue will be out soon, featuring articles on Chinese yixing ceramics, the Arts and Crafts leader Elbert Hubbard, Hungarian emigré potters, and contemporary artist Allison Smith.

Now the print journal has an online presence to explore the themes evoked in each issue. If you go to www.journalofmoderncraft.com <http://www.journalofmoderncraft.com> , you will see:

· Table of contents for each issue

· A key article available online for free in each issue

· Posts by guest bloggers on a theme specific to each issue

· Related notices of conferences and publications

· Links to related craft publications

The current theme is nostalgia. It asks the question: Is today’s traditional craft a form of manufactured nostalgia or grass-roots resistance? Guest bloggers Jivan Astfalk and Allison Smith are already contributing posts on this question. The featured article is a fascinating account of a national craft that is a site of both nation-building and resistance: “Traditional—with Contemporary Form”: Craft and Discourses of Modernity in Slovakia Today <http://journalofmoderncraft/docs/Makovicky.pdf> by Nicolette Makovicky. Upcoming themes will include craft activism, Africa and Japan.

Importantly, Journal of Modern Craft <http://journalofmoderncraft.com> online is an opportunity to:

· Participate in discussion through comments to the different posts

· Subscribe <http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify?uri=JournalOfModernCraft&amp;loc=en_US%22> to email updates containing latest posts

· Subscribe <http://journalofmoderncraft.com/feed/> to an RSS feed through readers such as Google Reader

· Subscribe <http://www.bergpublishers.com/?tabid=3254> to the full version (print and electronic) as an individual or institution

Craft is integral to our cultural diversity. World-shrinking technologies promise a utopia of mass interconnectivity, but we still need to ground ourselves in the world at hand. Join Journal of Modern Craft in a critical journey through the various ways craft practice has sought a place for itself in modernity.

If you have any inquiries about the website, please contact the online editor, Kevin Murray, at online@journalofmoderncraft.com .

The Journal of Modern Craft offers academic perspectives on all aspects of craft within the condition of modernity, from the mid-19th century to the present day, without geographical or disciplinary boundary. The journal is published 3 times a year by Berg Publishers. Is it edited by Glenn Adamson, Tanya Harrod and Edward S. Cooke Jr.

August 23, 2009

What is Virtual Heritage?

Erik Champion, School of Design, Massey Univ.

The notion
"Visualisation has been defined as 'to form a mental image of something incapable of being viewed or not at that moment visible'… (Collins Dictionary)... a tool or method for interpreting image data fed into a computer and for generating images from complex multi-dimensional data sets” (McCormick et al. 1987).


standard-full%5B1%5D.jpg


So the point of virtual heritage might be to visualize a culture through its artefacts. Virtual heritage is thus a ‘visualisation’ or ‘recreation’ of culture. In virtual heritage projects, the aim is typically to “recreate” or “reconstruct” the past through three-dimensional modelling, animation, and panorama photographs. In some advanced cases, objects are laser-scanned, and accurate textures of what used to be there are applied to the resulting digital models.

Why would we do that? For many reasons, for when a culture is no longer with us, when a culture is so ingrained that we do not normally notice or appreciate it, or when the remains of a society or civilisation are currently inaccessible or scattered.

It may now seem to us that virtual heritage is simply the recreation of what used to be there. Yet what used to be ‘there’ was more than a collection of objects. Those objects had specific meaning to the cultural perceptions of the land’s traditional inhabitants.

The problem of culture
If the cultural geographer Yi-Fu Tuan (1998) is to be believed, culture is that which is not seen: “Seeing what is not there lies at the foundation of all human culture”. He has further defined culture as a shared form of escapism. Such a definition raises an interesting paradox for the visualisation of past cultures. How do we see what is not there?

There are many issues in the presentation of culture. One is the definition of culture itself, the second issue is understanding how culture is transmitted, and the third is how to transmit this cultural knowledge to people from another culture. In the case of virtual heritage, a fourth also arises, exactly how can this specific cultural knowledge be transmitted digitally?

The problem of meaningful engagement
Research has indicated that the general public does not want realism but entertaining immersion. Various researchers have suggested that virtual environments (specifically heritage environments) often lack several features that would make them more engaging to the general public.

"... [T]he archaeological use of VR is at present all about the creation of pictures... Only after they have been generated does attention turn to the uses to which such models can be put" (Gillings, 2002: 17).

Both Gillings and I suggest it is not a lack of realism but a lack of meaningful content which impedes the enjoyment of virtual heritage (Champion 2006). I call it the ‘Indiana Jones’ dilemma. On the one hand, adventure films have popularised archaeology as an interactive and engaging pursuit. On the other hand, they and computer games typically destroy the very object of admiration. Digital media can recreate both objects and activities, but what sort of activity is both engaging and educational? How can we both significantly preserve and meaningfully communicate the past?

References

Champion, E. (2006). Enhancing Learning via 3D Virtual Environments. In E. Korsgaard-Sorensen & D.O. Murchu (eds). Enhancing Learning Through Technology. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.

Gillings, M. (2002). Virtual archaeologies and the hyper-real. In P. Fisher & D. Unwin (eds.), Virtual Reality in Geography. London: Taylor & Francis: 17-32.

McCormick, B., DeFanti, T. & Brown, M. (1987). Visualization in Scientific Computing. Computer Graphics. 21 (6): November.

Tuan, Y. (1998). Escapism. Baltimore: John Hopkins Univ. Press.

August 19, 2009

Digital archiving of records of anthropology

Nick Thieberger, University of Melbourne

The Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre (SAC) ran this conference (August 6/7 2009) on digital archiving of records of anthropological research in Thailand (http://www3.sac.or.th/archiving_culture/?page_id=61). The centre director, Dr. Paritta Koanantakool, talked of various initiatives to provide access to research outputs in Thailand, including the database on ethnic groups in Southeast Asia (http://www.cesd-thai.info). SAC is a resource centre with a library and museum in Bangkok that is now seeking to build a digital repository (www4.sac.or.th/anthropological_archive/) for research material, as discussed in the presentation by Thanwadee Sookprasert and Sittisak Rungcharoensuksri. DART - the Digital Archive of Research on Thailand is a collaboration between the University of Washington, SAC, and the Thai Institute for Population and Social Research. The project aims to archive multimodal research collections using a standard metadata system and to make existing collections discoverable by entering metadata even if the collection is not housed in the archive. It also aims to provide a portal for searching across various institutions with significant Thai collections.

The basic question is what is an archive? To dispel confusion it was made clear that an archive may have a web presence but is nothing to do with Flickr or YouTube ‚ it is a primary repository of historical records, fundamentally created for research.

Charles Keyes (University of Washington) gave a reflection on how he went about preparing his data for his own analysis, years after his initial fieldwork in the early 1960s. He set about transforming filecards, photos, fieldnotes and more and, in the process creating an archival form of the primary data. He noted that when ethnographic records are reconstrued as historical records, as can happen when they are preserved rather than being their epistemological status is transformed. It was refreshing to hear an established academic engaging with these issues as, in my experience it is rare to find a researcher so committed to preserving their own field materials, paying attention to standards for file formats and the metadata. (In fact, Robert Leopold later noted that of some hundreds of US anthropologists who retire each year, only about 20 deposit in a repository.)

Keyes noted that recording 'saves the said from the saying' (quoting Paul Ricoeur), fixing the spoken word that would otherwise be ephemeral and that the resulting archival objects are potentially problems for the host community, just as they are also likely to be welcomed by them as a wonderful resource.

Dr.Rasmi Shoocongdej (Archaeology, Silpakorn University) talked about the necessity to safeguard archaeological data so that claims made by one researcher can be checked by others. She gave the example of a skeleton she excavated which disintegrated after it was exposed to air, so the drawings and photographs taken of it become the only source that then have to be preserved. She also appealed for methodological notes to be stored with data to give more contextual information about how the collection was made in the first place.

In a panel discussion Charles Keyes and I talked about changing methods of data collection and assessing the value of fieldwork materials for a new generation of scholars. Good primary data requires planning before fieldwork and guidance about what standards to conform to (e.g., media formats, metadata standards: Open Archives Initiative, Dublin Core, etc). Publicly funded research must be made publicly available requiring open access repositories. Issues of intellectual property mean that permissions need to be sought during fieldwork. We need to encourage methods for creation of good, well-structured data in the course of normal fieldwork, without adding too much to the researcher's labour, but recognising that the work created will provide a firm foundation for future analysis. There was some discussion about the detail of metadata required for discovery of material in collections. Some advocate thin metadata which may be as thin as nothing, allowing the data to be discoverable based on its contents. I find this an impossible solution, imagine trying to find books in a library without a catalog, just searching on the books' contents. No standard terms would mean that you would only find part of what you were looking for, or else you would find way too much because all results in all sources would be returned. There was general agreement that 'good enough' metadata could provide a suitable finding aid while not making it too hard for the depositor to fill in a catalog. An example that we use at PARADISEC is the Open Language Archives Community

Robert Leopold (Smithsonian Institution) discussed issues in the online presentation of fieldnotes. What kinds of sensitivities can prevent access to research data? Should there be differential access for native peoples? He suggested that placing fieldnotes online complicates (rather than resolves) the ethical and methodological issues surrounding their use and reuse by subsequent researchers. Further, the selection of particular fieldnotes for digitization and online display naturalizes and valorizes their ethnographic authority in source communities.

Walsh (researcher) 'headnotes' are the notes in one's mind - more than could possibly be recorded, and are typically not included in any published version in order to ensure that the notes are 'objective', an illusion based on the absence of any information other than the written notes. An interesting observation that follows is that fieldwork never completely ends, as the interaction of the researcher, their 'headnotes' and the original records continues as the researcher's perspective on the original notes changes over time. The perspective of a researcher at the end of their career may be quite different, and potentially far richer in its understanding of the field material, than it was at the time of its recording.

Brigitte Vizina of WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organisation) an agency of the UN, presented some examples of how IP issues are managed by archives and other collecting institutions around the world. WIPO's mission is to build a balanced and accessible international IP system. She also guided us through a plethora of acronyms associated with the field, including TCE, or traditional cultural expression (= what was known as 'folklore') ‚ characteristic elements of the traditional artistic heritage of a community that are developed and maintained by a community. She also discussed misuse of TCE when music was misappropriated from a UNESCO archive. Some copyright does protect TCEs, but generally it protects derivative products based on TCE. Thorny questions arise, such as how do you manage TCEs in an archive when the interests of the tradition bearers conflict with the aims of the archive?

Mark Turin (Cambridge University) in a talk titled 'Collection, protection, connection' gave an overview of the Digital Himalaya Project (http://www.digitalhimalaya.com/). The lack of a single institutional centre for Himalaya study meant that a digital centre with a web portal was a logical choice, overcoming the problem of dismemberment of collections with papers going to a library, tapes to an audio archive, music to a music archive and so on. There were a number of films that needed preservation ('Nitrate won't wait') so the project made a homemade digitisation device for 16 mm film. They processed a subset of the collection to low level for delivery as an 'appetiser' and can then redo the same material at a higher resolution later. This is salvage anthropology of the products of salvage anthropology. If they didn't migrate these legacy formats while there was a chance to do so they would be lost. Turin noted that anthropologists may have worried about reintroducing old footage to current communities, but now with Youtube much of this is being done by others in less principled ways so anthropologists can take the opportunity to provide properly produced and contextualised material.

The project includes full online sets of rare journals and runs a digitisation office in Kathmandu where most of the work of converting material is carried out.
Turin also noted the work of Susan Whitfield in the Dunhuang project (http://idp.bl.uk/) in particular her article 'Navigating Through Uncharted Territory:IDP, An International Internet Digitisation Project', including the perils of technology (http://idp.bl.uk/downloads/UnchartedTerritory.pdf)

See: Creative heritage project - http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/folklore/culturalheritage/
Intellectual Property and Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Survey of Current Practices and Protocols in the South Pacifi

Anthropologists Rolf Husmann, Carina zur Strassen and Lahu filmmaker Jakhadte presented an exciting project in which they digitised 16mm film, made in the early 1960s by the Austrian Hans Manndorff, in northern Thailand. A team of four had made 53 short ethnographic films (the shortest of 4 minutes) which were never returned to the villages. The Institut fur den Wissenschaftlichen Film (IWF) (http://www.iwf.de/iwf/default_en.htm) ‚ now named IWF Knowledge and Media, Gottingen produced digital copies of the films for housing in Bangkok and return to the villages in the form of nine DVDs. Prof Manndorff is now 83 and an interview with him was played to the conference. Jakhadte is now involved in making a film about the whole process from his perspective as a representative of the northern hill-tribes.

There were a number of other presentations, some in parallel so I could not get to all of them, but see the online program for a listing.

August 15, 2009

Looking Good

David Sutton, Dept.of Anthropology, Southern Illinois Univ. Carbondale

Cristina Grasseni 2009. Developing Skill, Developing Vision: Practices of Locality at the Foot of the Alps. (European Anthropology in Translation ). Oxford: Berghahn.
ISBN 978-1-84545-537-8 Hb $70.00/£45.00

GrasseniDeveloping%5B1%5D.jpg

Cristina Grasseni’s new book, part of Berghahn’s “European Anthropology in Translation” series, illustrates how far anthropology and the tradition of European community studies has moved from studies of villages to studies in villages (to paraphrase Geertz). The keywords of Grasseni’s study are not the old social norms , values and mechanisms, nor even “identity” per se, but rather skill, enskillment, and practices of vision. Inspired most directly by the Phenomenology of Ingold and the Actor-Network Theory of Latour, Grasseni explores the ways that cattle breeders, in and around the mountain village of Vedeseta in the Valtaleggio region of the Italian Alps, go about the process of learning, transmitting and adapting their practices against a background of shifting social norms, EU regulations and global shifts in breeding knowledge, practice and evaluation. She is most directly interested in practices of looking and seeing, and how they are inflected by local and global systems of meaning and moral evaluation.

Developing Skill, Developing Vision, then, doesn’t read like a traditional ethnography, but rather an ethnographically-grounded series of reflections on issues of method and theory in anthropological understandings of the role of skilled, sensorily embodied practice in human collective life and relations with the environment. While focused on the practices of a group of cattle-breeders living in Vedeseta, Grasseni does not take “place” as a stable point for her analysis, but rather sees it as “an unfolding practice of belonging…an event rather than…a location” (38), which is, in fact, reproduced and reinvented in the process of adapting “local” skills and practices to “surviv[al] in the global market” (184).

Methodologically, Grasseni’s book explores interesting questions about the use of visual anthropology techniques in studying skilled vision. She analyses her own evolving use of video, critiquing some of the embedded assumptions of disappearing worlds that seemed to be inseparable from ethnographic film, moving to a more reflexive use of video which argues that anthropological participant-observation must be understood as an “apprenticeship of the eye.” As she writes (91):

"The filmic anthropology could not just be about stressing the image-storing capacity of recording technologies, but rather about using them as facilitators for the ethnographer’s access into a structured perceptual environment. I am claiming that an apprencticeship of the eye can further our ethnographic understanding of how practice and skills construct identities. This training of perception is intrinsic to the social structuring of practice, and is achieved by attuning oneself to the rhythms and sensitivities of a complex environment".

Thus, in attempting to capture the breeders’ “skilled vision” through her camera, Grasseni was gaining an apprenticeship, or an “education of attention” (as Ingold calls it), in how to properly look at cattle. By attending to the ways that cattle breeders showed her how to look, how they themselves used video and other recording media as part of their training in how to see their cattle, and reproducing the important distinctions in cattle breed, Grasseni doesn’t reject vision as Western and imperialist, but moves toward understanding it as part of a multisensory practice. She illustrates these notions, and leads into the analysis that follows, by showing how breeders in looking at fellow breeders’ stables, derive information about their skill, their network of information about the availability of bull semen, their adaptation of industrial architecture to the demands of mountain farming, their political connections that allowed them to work bureaucracies for proper permissions. In other words, in a description that recalled to me Alfred Gell’s notion of abducted agency, she argues that skilled vision reveals the display of “a large network of people and competencies supporting their enterprise, weaving the ‘traditional’ skills of cattle rearing, milking and cheese-making together with the ‘new’ skills of trading in genetically evaluated cattle, milking in high-tech parlours and securing state aid” (96).

The second half of the book gives a detailed description and analysis of these interrelated processes. Grasseni is particularly concerned to think through notions of changing skill in relation to so-called ‘traditional’ and ‘modern’ practices of breeding, taking up tensions in the discussions of Ingold and Latour as to whether global, abstract, capitalist processes lead to a decline of sensorily embodied skills or a transfer of skills from tool-using humans to black-boxed technologies. She examines these questions through key points in the process of cattle farming: the process of breeding, the milking parlour, and the production and marketing of “traditional” cheese.

In considering selective breeding, Grasseni describes the role of expert knowledge and standardizing artefacts in creating the international standards which discipline the vision of the community of practice of breeders and farmers. These artefacts include the forms and tables which breeders must fill out to evaluate cattle, which make possible the “partitioning gaze” and the quantification of the animal into a set of traits that allow the cattle to be compared “according to a single standard of reference, through numbers and listings that are published and circulated on the internet” (141). They also include the trophy cow replicas and toy cows which circulate in the community, the ubiquity and everydayness of which allow for the inculcation of values in relation to the proper appearance of cattle. And they include social occasions such as the cattle fairs, which allow for the display of expertise and the further solidification of the criteria for judging animals.

She also explores the tensions between aesthetics and functionality, and the universalizing, abstracting criteria of genetics and quantifiable morphology with the “concrete contexts” by which farmers make judgments about the appropriateness of cattle to particular conditions and “assumptions about what is virtuous knowledge and what makes virtuous conduct for a breeder” (159-160). Genetics, for example, is seen as providing a blueprint for the production of high quality cattle, but Grasseni shows that there is much taken on faith in investing ones resources in the discourse and knowledge of genetics—outcomes are based on all sorts of “local” and non-specifiable factors that used to be considered part of a breeder’s “instinct” (149). This insight provides a model for the relationship between “expert” and “local” knowledge more generally, as it is negotiated by the farmers of the Valtaleggio. But this doesn’t mean that these approaches are on a level playing field. Here, as below, farmers are forced to balance the high value given to discourses and practices of so-called “modernity” with the advantages of local knowledge and so-called “tradition,” and the moral and aesthetic commitments that go with an emplaced sense of cattle rearing practice.

In the case of the milking parlour, Grasseni shows that the mechanization of aspects of the milking process does not lead to a diminution of human skills. Even if certain senses, such as the vision to monitor the processes of milking rather than the more tactile aspects of hand milking, suggest a distancing or perhaps even alienation of humans and cows, Grasseni suggests that farmers still value the skills required in “a competent response to the animals’ reactions, needs and idiosyncrasies…Guiglielmo insists that each cow is different and that one needs to know how to bend the machine to her idiosyncrasies” (121), thus arguing for the ongoing “intimate relationship between milkers and cows” in the mechanized milking parlour.

Similarly, and recalling Latour’s work on laboratory life, Grasseni shows in the cheese making process the need for apprenticeship and interpretation even in the process of reading a “standardizing” device such as a thermometer (125). She concludes that “there is no zero-sum game of skill and technology by which an increase of technology means a decrease in skill in absolute terms. Here, however, Grasseni’s ethnography of such aspects of the cheese-making process seems a bit thin, and might be usefully read in conjunction with Heather Paxson’s (2008) work on this topic.

Indeed, Grasseni’s interest in cheese making focuses more on how changes in the presentation of the process are being made in response to EU hygiene regulations and tourist interest in “local” food products. Grasseni argues that much of the “skill” involved resides in the farmer’s capacity “to adapt or calibrate standard procedures to local recipes and ‘traditional tastes’” (128). It becomes a balancing act for farmers to package the cheese, in fancy, evocative wrapping, and “package” themselves, in videos and documentaries designed for urban and tourist consumption, as practicioners of a “local” tradition in close contact with an outsider’s nostalgic imagining of nature and peasant life, while still adapting to and adopting many aspects of current technology, standardization and bureaucratic demands. “Idyllic landscapes and pasteurized milk!” as Grasseni summarizes. While this part of Grasseni’s argument will be familiar to those in tourism studies or in food studies, she usefully traces how the ability to preserve “local” identity resides in the ability to smoothly negotiate and adapt to “global” bureaucratic protocols and capitalist markets. Thus, she stresses the irony that “local” products often imply much more than “local” skills (187).

I recommend this book to readers of this weblog interested in a rich ethnographic engagement with some of the key issues of materiality, skill, the senses and emplacement arising from the work of Ingold and Latour, and from the concerns of apprenticeship studies and visual anthropology. At the same time, it is an important contribution to revitalizing European community studies by combining concerns about place and identity with these other contemporary theoretical trends.

It would have been interesting for Grasseni to compare her work with that of Sarah Franklin (e.g. 2007) and others working on genetics and animal breeding in anthropology and science and technology studies, but this is a minor omission in an otherwise impressive ethnography. There are a few frustrating bibliographical errors in the text (for example, the oft-cited “Ingold 1993c” does not appear in the bibliography); whether such omissions are the fault of the author, or of publishers’ increasing laxity in copy editing is another matter. Overall, Berghahn is to be commended for its series on “European Anthropology in Translation.” If Skilled Vision is a representative example, I will be eagerly awaiting its forthcoming volumes.

References
Franklin, Sarah. 2007. Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.

Paxson, Heather. 2008. Post-Pasteurian Cultures: The Microbiopolitics of Raw Milk Cheese in the U.S. Cultural Anthropology. 23(1):15-47.

August 11, 2009

Significant Objects

At Significant Objects the premise is that the site's curators select an object, purchased randomly, and pair it with a writer, who writes a story which gives the object greater significance. The measure of this added value - the price the object fetches on ebay...

cow-creamer-550.jpg
http://significantobjects.com/2009/07/06/creamer/

August 7, 2009

The domestication and indigenization of global forces through consumption

Christian Sørhaug, Research Fellow, University of Oslo
Museum of Cultural History, Section for Ethnography

In writing up my thesis I am concerned with the domestication of global forces through consumption. The ethnography is centered on a small Warao village in the Orinoco Delta, Venezuela. In the marshes of the delta, with its myriads of river and creeks, the Warao live a relatively sheltered existence. But the isolation which the delta offers is only partial, and there is a range of actors and forces that interact with Warao everyday life. They qualify to the term “remotely global”, being an out of way place.

The Warao have been interacting with a range of ethnic groups, like the Arawak, and Carib, but lately the most significant other is the Hotarao. The Hotarao is a rather large ethnic group that the Warao use to designate the White-Creole people, like missionaries, politicians, traders and tourists, but especially the White-Creole population that live in the urban areas around the Orinoco Delta. Hotarao means “people from the raised/hard land” which makes out a contrast to the Warao meaning “people from the river’s edge/soft (marshes) land.” (Heinen 1998-1999)

Being the significant other the Hotarao have been in regular contact with the Warao for many decades, especially in the form of the Capuchin missionaries. The Capuchin first established a mission in the 1920’s and have since been actively seeking to transform Warao society into an image of their liking. Later Venezuelan state policy makers, doctors teachers, development agencies, NGO’s and traders have made their way into the area, all seeking to transform Warao society in different ways.

Even though there have been a multitude of forces seeking to influence Warao society, they have in large part been resilient towards these actors and institutions wish to transform them in their own image. Warao identity is very much alive, and is there is pride involved in being a Warao. In my thesis I am preoccupied with how the Warao have reconfigured, reconstituted and recreated themselves through the different types of global forces manifested through material culture and consumption activities (global forces being all the above types of Hotarao that exists).

So far in the process of writing up I have 5 major chapters that in different ways touch upon the problem of consumption, material culture and globalization, tentatively as follows:

The Wetlands: A village as a place that gathers things
The Orinoco delta is inhabited by the Warao Indians, numbering about 25.000, concentrating themselves in the south-eastern part. The fan like delta is divided by eight large rivers the major ones being Manamo and the Wirinoko (Rio Grande) moving into the Atlantic Ocean. The majority of the Warao live in the south eastern littoral zone of the delta where the rivers, creeks and channels carve out a range of island. Here the villages are built along the edges of the river on stilts to stay clear of the tidal waters that daily flood the landmasses. The houses are built with palm thatched roofs and bridges going out into the river. In the tidal zone the Orinoco Rivers enormous water masses clash with the tidal waves that daily flood the landmasses creating vortexes, or disturbances in the water. One of the words that the Warao use to designate such disturbances is hobure, which is also is the name of the village where I have done fieldwork.

Hobure.jpg
Hobure: The houses are built on stilts along the river’s edge with the swamp forest in the background.

Hobure, translated as “crazy waters”, is a community of about 250 people distributed on 35 households. The households are of varying sizes, but the majority has two major structures, the hisabanoko and hanoko. Hisabanoko is “the place for eating/food” where food is prepared and consumed, and is the house that is the furthest out into the river. The hanoko is the “the place for hammocks” which is the sleeping place where the hammocks are hanging from the roof beams, with small fireplaces in between them to hold the mosquito and the cold nights away. Behind the hanoko you also find the nahimanoko “the menstruation place” where women are during their menstruation. This is often a structure that several households share. It is located the furthest away from the river towards the forests to create distance to the nabarao – the river people that is attracted to the smell of blood and can kill menstruating women, but also children.

There is also the school, the church and a dysfunctional water tower in the village, structures that stand out in this place. While the household structures seem to have been built by things that have been gathered in the surrounding environment, these structures are made out of elements that have an origin far away from the village.

Hoisi.jpg
Hoisi: Through the whole village is a walking bridge (hoisi) connecting all the households. Moving about in this swampy environment usually requires a canoe.

The houses are for the most part built with Yawihi palm as roof materials, and manaca palm stems are used as floors. The house pillars, roof stems and roof skeleton is made from different types of wood, held together by its own weight, lianas and nails. Nails are used to the extent that the house owner can afford it.
The%20old%20school.jpg
The old chool: Now abandoned for a new school in the other part if the village, the concrete floor on the inside serves as a football arena for the boys playing.

Knowledge of building houses is passed between the generations and had a standard quadrant form. The school was contracted by the local government to outsiders who have the knowhow to build such school. The church on the other hand built the house with the cooperation with the villagers, partially with materials gathered from the forest. In contrast to other houses in the village it has wooden planks for walls and windows, zinc roof and floor boards. The building of the church versus the school also reflect the more cooperative relation the old capuchin missionaries have with the villagers versus the more unilateral relation that the government have with the people of Hobure. Maybe the worst working relationship is manifested in the structure left behind a water project funded by the government and the Red Cross. A large water tower stands slightly in the back of the village accompanied with a large water tank. A tube goes through the entire village offering each household a water tap. The water project failed due to bad construction and lack of funds, but the enormous structure stands in the village as a reminder of even another failed development project that has ended on the “garbage heap of development projects”.

The Warao have a subsistence economy based on gardening, fishing, gathering and hunting. The root crop ure (Colocasia Esculenta), originally an Asian tuber, has been introduced to the delta area in the early 20th century by Warao migrating workers coming from Guyana. This root has shown to be perfect for the delta habitat where one have been able to adopt the root without requiring much technological equipment or knowledge (Heinen 1974). The ohidu palm which used to be the major subsistence source as palm starch, is still of importance in relation to the making of hammocks, getting grubs, making fishing equipment and fruits. In the noara, or the nahanamu, ritual the fertility of the palm was celebrated, and likewise there was a gathering of people from different villages looking for potential partners. The pattern of uxorilocal marriages pulls young men out of their villages joining up in new vicinity neighborhood villages.

The Wastelands
This chapter investigates the migration of Warao to a garbage heap and their relation to garbage. Warao Indians living in the Orinoco Delta, Venezuela, travel to a large garbage heap outside of Ciudad Guyana. Ciudad Guyana was started as a planned community with a few thousand inhabitants in the sixties and has today grown to almost a million inhabitants. This enormous growth has been made possible due to the shifts in the world economy, with the expansion of markets for crude oil, steel and other minerals which make out the central industrial activities. But the city, situated along the Orinoco River, some hundred kilometers from the Warao home land, also produces large amount of garbage. This garbage is daily transported to Cambalache, a large wasteland, where a range of people scavenge and live of the garbage. Some poor white-Creoles live of the garbage, but for the most part it is the Warao, who is the major ethnic group in this part of Venezuela, that exploit this recourse.

The%20Wastelands.jpg
An extended family gathering: Standing in the garbage, the family of the village headman of the community of the Warao that have established themselves outside of the garbage heap

Life at the garbage heap implies an engagement with an extreme environment. Cambalache is called a red zone in Venezuela, where the security situation is especially bad, and the Warao refers to the place as wabanoko – the place of death. The smell, touch, sight and feeling of moving around in the garbage is intense, and the idea that you can fall sick due to rotten smell, koera, leads many Warao to fall sick in their initial days at the garbage heap. But when you get to know the smell, juku naminaya, you get used to it and it no longer makes you sick.

The ethnic stigma that is imposed by the Venezuelan White-Creole society toward the Warao is in part generated through such stigmatic activities like begging and gathering at the garbage heap. These types of activities lead to statements about the Warao – “No son seres humanos” – they are not human. The Warao themselves are aware of the stigma such activities lead to. As one of the women in my village screamed out when she got word that her daughter living in the city working for a Creole family that had forced her to eat out of the garbage, Oko Warao, basura nahorona – “we are Warao, we don’t eat garbage”.

Engaging with things and the problem of consumption
Globalization has been in part an understudied phenomenon in the Amazonian ethnography that has been focusing on isolated social groups and a fundamental cultural “otherness”. Today most isolated groups have had some type of contact and most Amazonian indigenous groups are struggling with coming to grips with this interaction. Nation state, global corporations, NGOs, missionaries and international development agencies are all actors in the frontiers of the Amazon engaged with different sets of motivations for interaction that impinges on the native populations. Here I am particularly concerned with the implementation of industrialized consumer goods and how they are domesticated and indigenized.

A central question I want to raise in this part of the thesis is how foreign consumer goods can be part of constituting Warao ethnic identity. The Amazon has been flushed with consumer goods; textiles from India, TV-sets from Taiwan and Salsa music from Spanish speaking Caribbean immigrants in the US are some aspects of material culture that the Warao engage with and are fascinated by. The research question is therefore circulating around identifying patterns of change related to the engagement with such consumer goods, and how this pertains to the question of identity.

Pedro%20and%20his%20freezer.jpg
Pedro and his freezer: Just before Christmas Pedro has prepared for the celebration.

Studies of identity and material culture in the Amazon have centred on the craft production; weaving, ceramics, canoes, hammocks etc. Little attention has been directed towards the position of industrialized consumer goods and their position in the making of identity. During fieldwork I found a profound interest and engagement with a range of commodities that Warao identified with. People in Hobure endorsed a range of commodities and used these to make statements about themselves and their own worth.

Again the “Other”, the White-Creole population (Hotarao), that the Warao interact with, plays an important role in this want for commodities. A part of my argument is that industrialized consumer goods are prestige objects that the Warao engage with to enhance their own standing in relation to the White-Creole. These goods are domesticated within the household and indigenized as a part of what is means to be Warao.

Shamans and Diosarotu – the owner of God
Though much of Warao ceremonial and ritual life have been transformed through their interaction with White-Creole society, and especially the Capuchin Missionaries that established themselves in the delta in the 1920, shamanism continuous to be of the utmost importance in everyday life. Questions of life and death, sickness and health, is administered by shamans. There are three major types of shamans among the Warao; Wisiarotu (wisiratu) – the owner of pain; Bahanarotu – owner of “objects”; Hoararotu – owner of the “hoa” (type of song), here it is the Wisiratu who is the most regular. The suffix – arotu indicates “owner”, or the one that has mastery over something.

Agustine%20posing%20for%20the%20camara.jpg
Augustine posing for the camera: Asking Augustine for a picture about the healing praxis, he quickly ordered his grandchild on the floor and demonstrated. Most curing sessions takes place in the hammock.

The concept of “hebu”, meaning spirit, is fundamental in understanding Warao cosmological beliefs and ideas about sickness. When the shaman, let’s say the Wisiratu, enters the home of a sick person, he will often enquire about the pain, but also about the life situation to his patient. The point of this interview as I see it is to try to understand what type of hebu it is that is making the person sick, or if it is a hebu at it all. Alongside beliefs about hebu there is also the idea that smell can make you sick. The anthropologist Werner Wilbert has suggested a theory about pneumatics (Wilbert 1998-1999). The theory states that there is a correlation between bad smells and sickness among the Warao. In this environment stagnant pools of smell are able to destabilize the body equilibrium, something I especially witnessed in the Wastelands, where Warao said they got sick from the smell of garbage. This type of sickness is seen as distinct from hebu, and must be cured by other means, like plant remedies. If the Wisiratu is of the opinion that the disease is caused by hebu he will initiate a curing session. Wisiratu curing consists in localizing the hebu massaging the body of the patient, establishing contact with the hebu through singing, sucking out the pathogen and finally offering smoke as food, or offering, for the hebu. As one shaman told me when he tried to explain the Wisiratu praxis; “the Wisiratu is like a police, and when he captures the criminal, hebu, he sends him to prison, or his home, nahamutu – the sky”.

Among the multitude of types of shamans I also found a diosarotu, which best can be translated as the owner of God. Stumbling over this type of shamanism happened as I was sick. Having been cured by a Wisiratu the day before, my adoptive mother was not satisfied and had sent for a Diosarotu. Rather intrigued by this new word, I was especially surprised when Gilberto, a know tidawena and one of the village authorities walked in and presented him as a Diosarotu. Tidawena means “twisted women” and is a term for homosexuals or transvestites, the “third gender” of the Warao. Gilberto sat down on his knees on besides my hammock, folded his hands, looked up to the palm thatched ceiling and said; “dear Jesus, my friend Christian is sick, could you please help me make him healthy”. Then he looked down and started massaging me, much the same way as the Wisiratu had done the day in advance. A clear difference was that he did not seem to stop at any particular place. After a while he stopped, folded his hand and started to mumble. In between the mumbling he pronounced words like “Benedicto” and “Dios Santos”. Gilberto, who did not know any Latin, was mumbling quasi Latin, imitating traits of the Capuchin Missionaries.

One potential interpretation of this hybrid form of shamanism could be that this is a way of trying to control the God. Shamanism can in general be seen as a way to exercise control over phenomenon that for lay persons are out of control. I suggest therefore that the Diosarotu is an experiment from the Warao point of view to manipulate and control God, portrayed as All Mighty by the Capuchin Missionary and the White-Creole society.

Tidawena – Cross gender: Skills and handicraft
Here I want to investigate the relation between gender, skills and consumption. Though the Warao society is relatively egalitarian, there is a range of fundamental distinction made continuously in relation to age and gender. How people make gender is very much part of which production, distribution and consumption activities they engage in. Men produce canoes, women hammocks; men distribute tobacco, women distribute food. The antithetical version of these gender images is found it the cross-gender, Tidawena – twisted women, and niborawena, twisted men. Tidawena is a common theme, while niborawena is much rarer. In Hobure there was only one niborawena – but it was not talked about.

As mentioned earlier, tidawena was a common term, used mostly for men who where homosexuals, but a common theme for them all, was that they preferred to engage in female activities – making hammocks, baskets, food and so on. They explicitly distanced themselves from male activities like hunting and making canoes. Niborawena, a more rear phenomenon, engages in shamanistic activities, smoking and the making of canoes. This inverting of gender images is common throughout America, referred to as the third gender. Elsewhere, I will also discuss the implication of the White-Creole macho-culture, making it relevant through the young men that have been visiting the city. Further the touristification of some of the handicraft – suitcase art – will be discussed, and how this affects the local economy.


References
Heinen, H. D. P. H. (1998-1999). "History, Kinship and the Ideology of Hierarchy Among the Warao of the Central Orinoco Delta." Antropologica 89: 25-78.

Heinen, H. D. R., Kenneth (1974). "Ecology, Ritual, and Economic Organization in the Distribution of Palm Starch among the Warao of the Orinoco Delta." Journal of Anthropological Research 30(2): 116-138.

Wilbert, W. (1998-1999). "Epidemology, Phytotherapy, and Pneumatic Chemistry: Warao Healt-Care in Culture-Historical Context." Antropologica 89: 79-95.

August 5, 2009

2010-2011 Clark-Oakley Fellowship

The Oakley Center for the Humanities & Social Sciences, Williams College (Massachusetts, USA), and the Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, a center for research and higher education as well as a public art museum, jointly offer a fellowship for national and international scholars, critics, and museum professionals who are engaged in projects that enhance the understanding of the visual arts and their role in culture. The Clark/Oakley Fellowship is an academic year appointment for a scholar in the humanities whose study addresses some aspect of the visual.

Clark/Oakley Fellows receive stipends, dependent on sabbatical and salary replacement needs, reimbursement for travel expenses, and local housing. Williamstown is located in a rural setting in the Berkshire Hills of western Massachusetts. Both Boston and New York City are about three hours away by car. Photos and more details of the Scholars' Residence are available at clarkart.edu/research.

Applications are invited from scholars with a Ph.D. or equivalent professional experience in universities, museums, and related institutions. Because of the highly competitive nature of the fellowship competition, we do not normally award fellowships to scholars whose dissertations are only recently completed.

The application deadline for fellowships awarded for the 2010-11 year is November 2, 2009.

For full fellowship guidelines and an application form, as well as further information, please visit: clarkart.edu/research or
williams.edu/resources/oakley/fellowships.htm.