NYU Linguistics

Halldor Sigurdsson, from Lund University, will give a talk in the NYU
Linguistics Colloquium Series this Friday 11/20 at 4:00pm. The title
of the talk is "Natural Nulls," abstract included below.

Abstract:

Roni Katzir will be giving a syntax brown bag on Friday Nov 6 at 1:30pm.

Title: On the roles of context and structure in the theory of alternatives
(Joint work with Danny Fox, MIT)

Abstract:
We present an argument for revising the theory of alternatives for Scalar Implicatures and for Association with Focus. We argue that in both cases, the alternatives are determined in the same way, as a contextual restriction of the focus value of the sentence, which, in turn, is defined in structure-sensitive terms. We provide evidence that contextual restriction is subject to a constraint that prevents it from discriminating between alternatives when they stand in a particular logical relationship with the assertion or the prejacent, a relationship that we refer to as symmetry. Due to the constraint on contextual restriction, discriminating between alternatives in cases of symmetry becomes the task of focus values. This conclusion is incompatible with standard type-theoretic definitions of focus values, motivating our structure-sensitive definition instead.

Dennis Ott (Harvard) will be giving a Syntax Brown bag on Friday, Oct 30th at 1:30pm in the 1st floor conference room (10 Washington Place).

Title:
Remnant Movement in German Revisited

Abstract:

Marina Tzakosta from U. of Crete is visiting the department, next Tuesday, Nov 3.
Marina got her PhD recently from Leiden. Her Promotor (Dutch nomencl.) was
Vincent van Heuven, her supervisor was Jeroen van de Weijer and the external
reader was John J. McCarthy. In general, Marina's work is on prosody and the
acquisition of phonology.

Title and abstract of her talk @ 1:30, next Tuesday, Nov 3 are as follows ....

"Exploring the representation of complex segments: the case of Greek affricates"

ABSTRACT (examples and references can be found here [pdf])

Chris Kennedy (U Chicago) will be giving a colloquium on Friday, Oct 30th at 4pm in the 1st floor classroom of 10 Washington Place. His talk is titled "Aspectual composition and scalar change". A reception will follow on the second floor.

Abstract:

Norbert Hornstein (Maryland) will be giving a colloquium on Friday, Nov 6 titled "Speculations on a Minimalist Approach to Pronoun Binding". All colloquia take place in the first floor classroom of 10 Washington Place at 4:00pm.

Abstract:

Tom Roeper (UMass) will present a Brown Bag on Oct 23 at 1:30pm in 10 WP, room 103.

"Vacate Phase and Presupposition Guarantee"

Two talks will take place in the classroom on the first floor of 10 Washington Place on Oct 22, 2009.

11am-12:15pm: Corrected High-Speed Anchored Ultrasound with Software Alignment
12:30pm-2pm: The Representation of Complex Segments (abstract in pdf)

For more information about events in the Phonetics and Experimental Phonology lab, click here.

Christine Mallinson (UMaryland, Baltimore County) will present a talk entitled "Bridging Professional and Public Linguistics" in the colloquium on Friday, October 9 in 10 Washington Place (first floor classroom). A reception will follow in the second floor.

Abstract:

Katherine Demuth (Brown) will present her talk titled "Phonological Constraints on Morphological Development" in the colloquium on Friday, Sept. 25th in 10 Washington Place (first floor classroom). A reception will follow in the second floor.

Abstract:

John Hale (Cornell) will be giving a colloquium talk next Friday, September 18th titled "What a rational parser would do". The talk will be in the linguistics building at 10 Washington Place, 1st floor. A reception will be held afterwords right upstairs on the 2nd floor.

Abstract:

Katrin Scultz, from the Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation
at the University of Amsterdam, will give a talk in the linguistics
department this tuesday:

Tuesday May 5th
at 11:00am
in the seminar room of the Linguistics department

"If you wiggle A, then B will change. On causal conditionals - again"
Katrin Schultz, ILLC, UvA

Abstract:

Gaja Jarosz (Yale) will be presenting a talk on Friday, May 1st at 2:30 in the Linguistics Department Library.

Title: Learning of Phonology: Integrating Developmental and Computational Perspectives

Abstract:

Jeroen Groenendijk will be giving a talk on Inquisitive Semantics and Pragmatics this Wednesday, 29 April, 2009, Linguistics department, 7th floor, 726
Broadway, New York, at 12:00 Noon.

**Please note that the starting time is noon.**

Oussama Haddad will be giving a syntax brown bag on Friday May 1 at 1:30 in the Linguistics department conference room.

Title: The Silence of the NOUNS: Alternate Agreement in Lebanese Abstract Nominal Constructions

Abstract:

Elisabeth Selkirk and Angelika Kratzer of UMass Amherst will be giving a colloquium talk on Friday April 24th at 4pm in Silver room 509.

Title: Distinguishing contrastive, new and given information

Abstract:
The question of how linguistic theory should break down the dimension of “information structure” that includes contrastiveness, newness and givenness continues to be a subject of debate. This paper defends the three-way distinction between given, new, and focus of contrast originally proposed in Chafe 1976. Phonological and phonetic data are presented from English which support this three-way contrast. The paper argues that the status of a constituent as new is unmarked in the grammar, while constituents which are given or are a focus of contrast are marked as such in the syntactic representation which mediates between sound and meaning. This proposal echoes a recent proposal by Féry and Samek-Lodovici 2006.

We will show that a system which gives morphosyntactic representation to focus of contrast (FoC-marking) and to givenness (G-marking) but which leaves newness morphosyntactically unmarked has the right consequences for theories of the interfaces of syntax with sentence prosody on the one hand and semantics on the other. On the semantics side, renditions of the Rooth 1992 theory of alternatives focus and the Schwarzschild 1999 theory of givenness
are combined with a set of syntax/semantics interface constraints to provide the interpretation and distribution of sentences whose constituents are FoC-marked, G-marked, and/or unmarked for either. On the phonology side, it is shown that all-new sentences receive a phonological interpretation that is based on general phonological principles, without any appeal to the morphosyntactic feature make-up of the sentence.

We will also explore some of the typological predictions of our proposal: whether FoC-marking or G-marking are expressed in sentence prosody varies (independently) from one language to the next. Some languages show no prosodic reflexes of these morphosyntactic contrasts at all, instead defaulting to the types of unmarked sentence prosody found in all-new sentences.

The Sociolinguistics Working Group is hosting a talk by Ronald Beline Mendes of the Universidade de São Paulo this Friday, April 17, on "Language change from within: from auxiliary verb to prefix in Brazilian Portuguese".

Time: 11 AM - 12:30 PM.
Place: NYU Linguistics Dept. Classroom, 726 Broadway, 7th floor

Jessica Coon will be giving a brown bag on Friday April 17th at 1:30 in the Linguistics department conference room.

Title: Predicate Fronting and its Consequences: Ergativity in Chol

Abstract:

Daniel Kaufman will be giving a Syntax Brown Bag on Friday April 3 at 1:30 in the Linguistics Conference room.

Title: v-free predication in Austronesian and its consequences, from root to clause

Abstract:

Friederike Moltmann will be giving a syntax brown bag on Friday, March 27th at 1:30 in The Linguistics Conference Room (726 Broadway, 7th Floor)

Title: Reifying Terms

Abstract:

Hedde H. Zeijlstra will be talking to us about his work on French ne pas, arguing that ne is an NPI. The talk is at 1:30 PM, at 726 Broadway 7th Floor conference room. Light snacks and beverages free for all who come.

Pas de problème

Abstract

Friday, March 6 in Silver 509. Reception to follow in the linguistics department.

Title: The projection problem for pragmatic inferences

Abstract

Chris Tancredi of Keio University has kindly agreed to visit us this Friday and give a version of the talk that he is giving tomorrow at Princeton, entitled "Domains of quantification, rigid designation and modality: The case for multiple models". The abstract is copied below. The talk will be at 1:30PM in the Syntax/Semantics Lab.

Roberto Zamparelli (Trento) will be giving a syntax brown bag on Feb 20 at 1:30 in room 703 of the linguistics department (726 Broadway, 7th floor)

TITLE:

Coordination, Non-nominal Subjects and Semantic Agreement

Stephanie Harves (Pomona) will be giving a talk "To have and to need in Russian and beyond" on Tuesday, Feb. 10 at 9am in the linguistics department conference room

Vera Gribanova (UCSC) will be giving a talk titled "Ellipsis and the syntax of verbs in Russian" on Tuesday morning at 9am in the linguistics department conference room.

Abstract:

Asya Pereltsvaig

"The syntax of noun phrases in Russian: Elucidating functional architecture"

Friday January 30, 9am - 10:30am
Linguistics Department Conference Room
726 Broadway, room 701

Robert Podesva (Georgetown) will be giving a colloquium talk on Friday Jan. 30 titled "Linking phonological variation to discourses of race and place in Washington, D.C." The talk will be in room 414 810 of the Silver Center at 4pm, with a reception in the linguistics department following.

An abstract for the talk can be found here (pdf)

Friederike Moltmann
(IHPST, Paris)

"Presentational pronouns"

Friday, December 5 at 1:30pm
726 Broadway, room 703

Abstract:

In this talk I will take a closer look at the syntax and semantics of the pronouns 'this, 'that, and 'it' as their occur in (1a, b, c):

(1) a.This is Mary.
b. That is a wellknown person.
c. It was a student.

'This', 'that' and 'it' in (1) do not have a referential function, but rather occur in the subject position of specificational sentences, exhibiting the same constraints as subject wh clauses, as in (2):

(2) What I saw was a wellknown person.

The occurrences of the pronouns in (1) shed a significant light on the question whether specificational sentences express an identity of (possibly higher-order) meanings, question-answer relations, or function-value relations (with the subject acting as an intensional NP (Romero)). I show that specicational sentences with 'this', 'that' and 'it' in subject position support a question-answer analysis, but at the same time require signficant modications of existing accounts. I will also point out how a proper syntactic and semantic analysis of sentences as in (1) and (2) allows for a re-evaluation of certain philosophically significant sentences that appear to support a view of relative identity.

Janet Pierrehumbert (Northwestern University)

"Northern Cities Vowels and Dialect Contact"

Friday, December 5 at 4pm
Silver Center, Rm 414

Abstract:

The Northern Cities Chain Shift has created substantial differences between the Northern Cities vowels and those in nearby speech communities. Most speakers lack conscious awareness of these differences. However, they have consequences for speech processing. In this talk, I will review recent results (with collaborators Cynthia Clopper and Ken Konopka) on the Northern Cities vowel system in contact with the Midland dialect and the Chicago Mexican Heritage dialect of English. The results indicate that indexical information interacts with phonological information in speech perception, speech production, and phonological acquisition.

Svitlana Antonyuk-Yudina

"On the Prosodic Realization of Doubly Quantified Sentences in Russian"

Friday, November 14 at 1:30pm
726 Broadway, room 703

Abstract:

Mark Baltin and Jeroen van Craenenbroeck

"On Becoming A Pronoun"

Friday, November 7 at 1:30pm
726 Boadway, 7th-Floor Conference Room

Abstract:

Many processes in grammar look as though they require reference to a feature
[+pronoun], in that expressions of other types appear to change to pronouns. We
argue that appeal to such a feature is the wrong way to look at this phenomenon,
and that a more fruitful way to approach this phenomenon is to adopt Postal's
(1966) analysis of pronouns as determiners with deleted complements. In this way,
we can account for why elements appear to change to pronouns, but not , say,
anaphors; the feature‐changing approach, by contrast, makes both types of change
equally possible, and does not, as a consequence, account for why the former type
of change occurs, but not the latter. We show that our account does not violate
Chomsky's (1995) Inclusiveness Constraint, which limits the appearance of
elements in syntactic computations to those that are present from the outset of the
computation; the feature‐changing approach does violate Inclusiveness. We also
show that this approach to pronouns accounts for vehicle change in ellipsis
contrasts, the pronominal character of various kinds of empty elements, such as
ellipsis sites and traces, and the existence of copy‐raising (Moore (1998), in which
an element raises and a pronoun occurs at the raised element's point of origin.

Ivona Kucerova (UCL)

"A-Scrambling as Grammatical Marking of Prepositions"

Wednesday, October 29 at 5:30pm
726 Broadway, Room 703

Abstract:

Scrambling is usually understood as a feature-triggered operation that is avaialable only under rather strict pragmatic conditions and only in some languages. Even though a lot of attention has been paid to syntactic properties of scrambling, it still remains mysterious why scrambling takes place at all and why it takes place only in some language. Furthermore, there are significant differences between scrambling languages both with respect to type of movement labeled as scrambling and the set of syntactic elements that undergo this movement.

In this talk I will offer an answer to these questions in terms of scrambling as a parasitic syntactic operation which purpose is to Maximize Presuppositons (Heim 1991). I will build on Schwarzschild's (1999) account of givenness, following Rooth (1992), under which givenness is semantically interpreted, but focus is grammatically marked. I will presents a case study of a language in which it is not focus but givenness that that is always grammatically marked (cf. Wagner 2005, 2006 for arguments that even in English givenness must be sometimes grammatically marked). Crucially, movement plays a role in this process.

In Czech, given elements must linearly precede new elements. If this relative ordering cannot be achieved by base generation, movement must take place. I will argue for a natural language operator that marks elements in its scope as given. The operator divides the structure between a given and a new part. The role of Maximize Presupposition is to enforce that every given element is in the scope of the operator. The operator and Maximize Presupposition work in tandem with an economy condition on movement that licenses movement only if it yields otherwise unavailable semantic interpretation (cf. Fox 1995, 2000, Reinhart 1995). The proposal thus provides independent evidence for a structural competition in the grammar and for the role of Maximize Presupposition in the process. Furthermore, understanding scrambling as presupposition marking allows us to understand scrambling in context of other grammatical means for Maximizing Presupposition such as definiteness marking, agreement, or special morphological markers.

Gabriela Alboiu (York University)

"On Silent Categories and Case"

Friday, October 24 at 1:30pm
Syntax/Semantics Lab

Abstract:

By focusing on (c)overt subjects in non-finite domains I provide an account of structural Case reliant on the phase domain (Chomsky 2008) rather than the presence of phi-features (i.e., uφ). I argue that uφ is not needed for either Case checking or for obtaining a Case value. Nonetheless, I show that the presence of uφ (and specifically a Person feature, π) on the Probing domain will ensure a NOM value, while its absence will constrain the DP to an ACC value. I propose that a null expletive checking the EPP feature will trigger NOM subjects whenever (C)-T lacks uφ, specifically, in non-finite domains, such as infinitives and gerunds. Crucially, lexical subjects in non-finite domains are not assigned default Case; rather ACC or NOM are systematic occurrences, dependent on the presence or absence of non-referential pro. In effect, an A-relationship guarantees interaction with specific properties/features of some Probe. This feature complex in turn ensures a certain morphological instantiation of the vocabulary item inserted post-Spell-Out. Under this analysis, the overwhelming cross-linguistic evidence of Case-marked PRO is also readily explained. PRO either has: (i) Case checked against a Probe, so assigned a value (e.g. NOM in Icelandic, ACC in English), or (ii) Case checked at Spell-Out, so default (e.g. NOM in German, Czech), but never 'null Case'. It also explains why default Case will not guarantee lexical subjects (e.g. German has NOM as default but no lexical subjects in non-finite clauses), or why lexical subjects in non-finite domains can have Case values distinct from the default (e.g., see Latin). Crucially, the proposed analysis has the benefit of correctly predicting the various empirical generalizations with respect to DP Case valuation, as well as providing support for divorcing structural Case values from specific functional heads. NOM or ACC are not syntactic primitives or a priori properties of (C)-T and v, respectively, but forms assigned post-Spell-Out based on specific instructions from the computational system. In this sense, then, "syntax has no case features" (Sigurðsson 2007), but A-relations in syntax enable specific Case values.

Lisa Matthewson (University of British Columbia)

"Moods vs. Modals in St'át'imcets and Beyond" Abstract

Friday, October 24 at 4pm
Silver Center Room 414

Jennifer Bloomquist

"'Girrrl, my car needs warshed!' Regional dialect accommodation by African American English speakers in the Lower Susquehanna Valley"

Friday, October 17 at 1pm
Department Conference Room

Abstract:

When members of minority groups migrate to majority communities, their rates of assimilation (or non-assimilation) to the majority culture are dependent on several factors including, but not limited to, the following: 1) the degree of physical, social, and economic isolation experienced by the migrants in their new location, 2) the history of the migration and ways in which the newcomers are received by the members of the established community, 3) the construction of a new community identity, and 4) the strength of the connection the migrants maintain to their former community.

This study examines the socio-historical acquisition and non-acquisition of the regional dialect by African Americans who are at least second generation residents (i.e., natives) of Pennsylvania's Lower Susquehanna Valley (the area that includes Harrisburg, York, and Lancaster) and investigates the reasons contributing to differences found among these speakers in terms of the degree to which they have acquired the local variety. The linguistic factors that are considered are region-specific elements of lexicon, syntax, and phonology; social and historical factors involve the migrant African Americans' relationships to the European American community including physical location (rural vs. urban, integrated vs. segregated), socio-economic status, rates and types of contact among speakers, and the connections maintained by the relocated members to their home communities.

Findings suggest that while rates of dialect accommodation are somewhat location specific (rural vs. urban), they are also influenced by the ways in which members of each community identify (or resist identifying) both locally and with larger, nearby African American communities. The results also challenge long held assumptions regarding the supra-regionality of African American English and the ways in which regional varieties have influenced the development of
AAE.

Olga Kagan

"On the Semantics of Genitive Objects"

Friday, October 10 at 1:30pm
Department Conference Room

Abstract:

In this talk, I will investigate the semantics of Intensional Genitive Case in Russian, a phenomenon whereby certain intensional verbs may take genitive objects, as well as accusative ones, as is illustrated in (1):

(1) On ždal čuda / Dimu.
he waited miracle.GEN Dima.ACC
He was waiting for a miracle / for Dima.

Two puzzles arise in connection with the distribution of Intensional Genitive: first, it is licensed only by strong intensional verbs in Farkas' (1985) terminology (e.g. ždat' (wait for), zasluživat' (deserve), trebovat' (demand)) and not by weak intensional verbs (e.g. predstavljat' (sebe) (imagine), predvidet' (foresee), izobražat' (draw, depict)). The second question concerns the choice of Case for objects of strong intensional verbs. As has been noted in the literature (Neidle 1988, Bailyn 2004, Kagan 2005), the choice of Case is dependent on a number of semantic properties. For instance, the genitive tends to be assigned to non-specific, indefinite, narrow scope NPs. At the same time, none of these properties is sufficient to account for the alternation.

I will propose a semantico-pragmatic analysis of Intensional Genitive that is based on the notion of existential commitment, i.e. existential entailment and/or presupposition. It will be argued that Intensional Genitive can only be assigned in the absence of commitment to existence in the reference world, as well as in the set of worlds that is introduced by the intensional predicate (and forms the embedded context set). I will also discuss the relation between existential commitment and individuation, a property that has been argued to affect Case-assignment to objects in a wide range of languages (e.g. Hopper and Thompson 1980, Grimm 2005).

Michael Becker (Reed College)

"The role of markedness in generalizing over lexical exceptions"

Friday, October 10 at 4pm
Silver Center Room 414

Joint work with Lena Fainleib (Tel Aviv University)

Lexical exceptions have been repeatedly shown to influence speakers’ treatment of novel items (Bybee & Moder 1983 and many others since), which was taken to mean that lexical exceptions have an impact on the grammar. With the advent of Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004), lexical exceptions have been modeled using markedness constraints (Zuraw 2000, Albright & Hayes 2003, Hayes & Londe 2006, Pater 2006, Becker 2008, among others). These OT accounts share the prediction that speakers will generalize over the output properties of lexical exceptions, since by definition, markedness constraints only assess output forms. I claim that this prediction is correct, and show that Hebrew speakers prefer output-based generalizations to input-based generalizations even in the absence of evidence for it in the source language.

In Hebrew, masculine nouns regularly take the suffix [-im]. Of the irregular nouns that take [-ot], most have [o] in their stem, i.e. the affix agrees with the stem vowel. Since the stem [o] stays unchanged, speakers can’t tell whether [-ot] agrees with the singular stem [o] or the plural stem [o].

In an artificial input-output mapping experiment, 60 Hebrew speakers were assigned to learn one of two artificial languages. In both languages, singulars were the same plausibly native novel nouns. In the plural stems, [o] was switched with [i] (1) and [i] with [o] (2) — changes that are absent from real Hebrew. In the “surface” language, the plural suffixes [-im] and [-ot] were selected to agree with the vowel in the plural stem, whereas in the “deep” language, the plural suffixes were selected to agree with the vowel in the singular stem.

Singular_____“Surface” language plural_____“Deep” language plural
(1) apóz____________apiz-ím___________________apiz-ót
_____agóf_____________agif-ím___________________agif-ót
(2) amíg_____________amog-ót_________________amog-ím
_____axís______________axos-ót__________________axos-ím

When asked to generate plurals for novel items, the “surface” language participants were significantly more successful in applying the required vowel changes and affix selection, demonstrating a universal bias toward output-based generalizations.

I show that the results follow nicely from a model in which speakers assign an Optimality Theoretic grammar to the artificial languages, using the same constraints they use in real Hebrew. Models that make input-based generalizations by learning from input-output mappings fail to capture the results. Interestingly, models that rely on raw phonotactics of the language, without deriving these phonotactics from universal principles, fail as well.

Joan Bresnan (Stanford University)

"Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and
Australian varieties of English"

Friday, October 3 at 4pm
Silver Center, 414

Joan Bresnan (Stanford University & Marilyn Ford (Griffith
University, Australia)

Traditionally, linguistic variation within different time scales has
been the province of different disciplines, each with a distinctive
suite of techniques for obtaining and analyzing data. For example,
historical linguistics, sociolinguistics and corpus linguistics study
variation between different speaker groups over historical time and
across space, while psycholinguistics, phonetics, and computational
speech recognition and synthesis study the dynamics of producing and
comprehending language in the individual on a scale of milliseconds.
Yet there is evidence that linguistic variation at these different
time scales is linked, even in the domain of higher-level syntactic
choices. This is a primary finding in the present study of dative
constructions, illustrated by (1a,b), in Australian and American English.

1a) Who gave you that wonderful watch? (V NP NP)
b) Who gave that wonderful watch to you? (V NP PP)

We use a very accurate multilevel probabilistic model of corpus dative
productions (Bresnan, Cueni, Nikitina, and Baayen 2007) to measure the
predictive capacities of both American and Australian subjects in
three pairs of parallel psycholinguistic experiments involving
sentence ratings (Bresnan 2007), decision latencies during reading
(Ford 1983), and sentence completion. The experimental items were all
sampled together with their contexts from the database of corpus
datives, stratified by corpus model probabilities.

We find that the Australian subjects share with the American subjects
a sensitivity to corpus probabilities. But they also show covarying
differences, notably a stronger end-weight effect of the recipient in
the ratings task and the absence of a dependency-length effect of the
theme argument in the decision latency task (cf. Grodner and Gibson
2005). A unifying explanation for these differences is that decision
latencies for `to' are reduced and naturalness ratings are increased
when a PP is consistent with expectation. The Australian group would
then be predicted to have a higher expectation of PP than the US
group. This prediction is borne out by the sentence completion tasks,
which showed that the Australians produced NP PP completions more than
the American subjects in the same contexts. These findings suggest
that subtle variations in the experiences of the dative construction
by historically and spatially divergent speaker groups can create
measurable differences in internalized expectations in individuals
at the millisecond level.

Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina, and R. Harald
Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In
_Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation_, ed. by G. Boume,
I. Kraemer, and J. Zwarts. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy
of Science, pp. 69--94.

Bresnan, Joan. 2007. Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic?
Experiments with the English dative alternation. In _Roots:
Linguistics in search of its evidential base. Series: Studies in
Generative Grammar_, ed. by Sam Featherston and Wolfgang
Sternefeld, pp. 75--96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Ford. Marilyn. 1983. A method for obtaining measures of
local parsing complexity throughout sentences. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22: 203--218.

Anthi Revithiadou (University of the Aegean)

"Recursivity of the Phonological Word as the Result of the Interface"

Thursday, October 2 at 12:30pm
726 Broadway, 7th floor
Conference room

In this talk, we will address the notion of recursivity (REC) in the
phonological word (PW). We start with the question of whether such a
constituent is necessitated in phonological theory and explore alternatives
that have recently been proposed against recursion (e.g. Vogel?s (2006, in
press) Composite Group). We will also demonstrate that much of the confusion
surrounding the notion of phonological recursion in the literature arises from
the fact that inconsistent arguments have been put forward in support of
PW-REC, in which the burden of proof primarily falls on showing that an element
is not part of a certain prosodic category rather than on establishing its REC
status. Following Kabak & Revithiadou (in press), we will argue that recursion
is not an inherent property of phonology, but rather the by-product of its
interface with morpho-syntax as reflected in two types of structures: (a)
Inherently recursive morphosyntactic structures such as certain types of
compound constructions and (b) certain types of clitics which adjoin to their
host after moving from their base-generated position (Spyropoulos 1999). The
present proposal will be substantiated with empirical evidence from Greek and
Turkish.

Shinichiro Ishihara

"Independence of Focus from Prosodic Phrasing: Evidence from Japanese"

Focus intonation (FI) in Tokyo Japanese has often been analyzed in terms of prosodic phrasing (Pierrehumbert and Beckman 1988, Nagahara 1994, Truckenbrodt 1995, among others). In this line of analysis, an FI is analyzed
as a large MaP created by manipulating (i.e., inserting and deleting) MaP boundaries.

In this talk, I will present phonetic differences between FI and MaP boundaries, based on an experiment which examines phonetic effects of focus and syntactic boundaries independently. I will propose that MaP and FI are computed according to independent mechanisms: MaP phrasing according to a syntax-prosody mapping principle, and FI according to relative prominence.

The experimental results also indicates that MaP phrasing, which would be assumed to be non-recursive under the Strict Layer Hypothesis, shows recursivity.

Mid-Manhattan Library welcomes

K. David Harrison DISCUSSING

When Languages Die: The Extinctions of the World’s Languages and The Erosion of Human Knowledge

Monday, September 22nd, 2008

6:30 p.m.
on the 6th floor
Mid-Manhattan Library
The New York Public Library
40th Street and 5th Avenue
New York, NY 10016
212-340-0873

Speakers of thousands of the world’s languages are now abandoning their ancestral tongues at an unprecedented rate. What exactly is lost when speakers of indigenous languages switch to speaking English, Hindi, Russian, or other global tongues? Why should we care if small languages vanish?

Languages are the repository of thousands of years of people’s science and art – from observations of ecological patterns to creation myths. The disappearance of a language is not only a loss for the community of speakers itself, but for our common human knowledge of mathematics, biology, geography, philosophy, agriculture, and linguistics. In this century, we are facing a massive erosion of the human knowledge base.

David Harrison is assistant professor of linguistics at Swarthmore College.

Elevators access the 6th floor after p.m.
All programs are FREE.

Friday Colloquium Series
Friday, September 19, 2008 @4pm
Norma Mendoza-Denton (University of Arizona)
Silver Building, Room 414

Entrainment in the vocalic system and in speech breathing: Evidence
from conflictive speech.

Entrainment is the phenomenon of synchronization/imitation of action on
the part of separate agents (in the physical sciences:
entrainment=sharing periodicity, either on- or off-phase). For
instance, lexical entrainment means that speakers who routinely talk
about the same topic come to share the same vocabulary for it. This
presentation examines vocalic and speech breathing entrainment in
congressional town hall meetings (THMs) held by Republican Congressman
Jim Kolbe (R-5th district, AZ). Kolbe agreed to be taped as part of a
nonpartisan research project, and allowed the presence of our cameras
at 10 THMs over a period of 14 months during 2000-2001. I focus
specifically on the sociophonetic aspects of entrainment in the context
of face-threatening behavior by constituents. Face-threatening behavior
comes in the form of opinions, challenges or questions that
constituents deliver which threaten Kolbe's control of the structure
of the THM. Gestural, intonational, and vocalic as well as speech
breathing evidence are joined with conversational analysis to address
questions of convergence and divergence in linguistic behavior.

Thursday, September 18 @ 11:30am
Linguistics department library
Talk: Jen Hay
Hearing /r/-sandhi

An exploration of the status of linking /r/ and intrusive /r/ via a series of phoneme-monitoring experiments on New Zealand English.

Wednesday, September 17 @ 10:30am
Linguistics department
Talk: Jen Hay
Speech Perception with Attitude: Adventures on a fush/feesh continuum

This talk describes three studies designed to follow up on Niedzielski's (1999) work which seems to show that the perceived dialect area of a speaker can affect a listener's perception of their vowels. Experiment 1 replicates this general effect with New Zealand listeners - the labels 'New Zealander' or 'Australian' on an answer sheet affect vowel perception. Experiment 2 demonstrates that this effect is not, in fact, driven by listeners' overt beliefs about the speaker. It can be replicated by placing stuffed toys in the experiment room (kiwis in one condition, or kangaroos and koalas in the other). Experiment 3 explores the degree to which listener attitudes can affect perception - demonstrating that exposing participants to 'good' facts about Australia shifts their perception in a different direction from exposing them to 'bad' facts about Australia. Together, the results demonstrate subtle but robust effects of sociolinguistic 'style-shifting' in perception, and illustrate that these effects are, in fact, relatively automatic.

Jen Hay
Coronal Stop Deletion Revisited
Friday, September 12 @ 4pm
Silver Center 414

Abstract:

Final coronal stop deletion (as in, e.g. jus(t) yesterday or ol(d) man) has perhaps received more attention in the literature than any other sociolinguistic variable. This talk takes a new look at the phenomenon by exploring a data-set drawn from early New Zealand English. We have explored a number of potential predictive factors which are not traditionally considered. This talk focuses on three in particular: lexical frequency, phonological neighbourhood density, and the force exerted by the complete distribution of environments in which a given lexical item tends to occur. The resulting picture lends strong support to exemplar-based models of the lexicon. It also casts important new light on factors which previous studies have identified as robust predictors of deletion rates.

There will be a Special Lecture in Linguistics and Philosophy given by Derek Bickerton (Professor Emeritus, Univeristy of Hawaii) on Wednesday, April 2 and 5pm in Meyer 815. The talk is entitled "Bastard Tongues: A Life in Linguistics".

Joel Wallenberg (UPenn) will be giving the syntax brown bag at 1:30 on Friday, March 7th. The title of his talk is "Generalizing Holmberg's Generalization: scrambling and phrase structure in synchronic and diachronic perspective" and the abstract can be found here.

Jeremy Rafal (CUNY) will be talking about Pseudoclefts in Ilokano at the Syntax Brown Bag on February 22nd. The talk will be at 1:30 in room 703 (726 Broadway). The abstract for his talk can be found here.

Click below for information on the LANYU Fora from Spring 2000 through Fall 2007.

About LANYU (Linguistics Association of NYU) - Graduate student organization

Spring 2008
Fall 2007
Spring 2007
Fall 2006
Spring 2006
Fall 2005
Spring 2005
Fall 2004
Spring 04
Fall 03
Spring 03
Fall 02
Spring 02

March 11, 2:00pm (time changed)
GLOW Practice Talk: Tom Leu: The syntax internal to Germanic determiners

April 24, 1:00 Lunch, 1:30 Talk
Practice Talk: Simanique Moody
TBA

About LANYU (Linguistics Association of NYU) - Graduate student organization

Click on the links below for schedules and abstracts from talks organized by the NYU Working Group in Urban Sociolinguistics.

Fall 2006
Spring 2006
Fall 05
Spring 05
Spring 04
Fall 03
Spring 03
Spring 02
Fall 01
Spring 01
Fall 00
Spring 00

Click here

Click Here

Click on the links below for schedules and abstracts from the NYU linguistics syntax/semantics series of talks

Spring 2007
Fall 2006
Spring 2006
Fall 05
Spring 05
Fall 04
Spring 04
Fall 03
Spring 03
Fall 02
Fall 01
Spring 01
Fall 00
Spring 00

Click on the links below for schedules and abstracts for the NYU Linguistics Department Friday Colloquia

Fall 2007
Spring 2007
Fall 2006
Spring 2006
Fall 2005
Spring 2005
Fall 2004
Spring 2004
Fall 2003
Spring 2003
Fall 2002
Spring 2002
Fall 2001
Spring 2001