I was browsing through some of your practice entries into the Faculty Digital Archive and wanted to make a posting about what should be in the description field. I thought it would be good to see a catalogue entry for a project I worked on at the Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology to illustrate the kinds of information you should be thinking about:
Here is the image that the entry refers to:

Here are some snapshots of the catalogue focusing on the description and notes fields:

In the notes field, there is too much text for me to take a full snapshot, but the information reads:

On catalogue card, top right hand corner: “Taken and given by J. W. Layard.”
Layard’s handwritten captions says:
“3. Atchin, R.C. Mission house lent to us.
L-R Top Row: Malpuraim, Meltekshulü, Nalekon (with hand on Meltegewetpue, sone of M-shulü), Meldektaus.
L-R bottom row: Kalerib, Nale, Maluarasi, Malteris, Meltegele, Rivers, Maletelauli, Tipe (Franky)”
Handwritten “List of photographs (original). UCSD Mandeville Collection, MSS 84, Box 31, Folder 10.
[H. Geismar 20/04/04]
The notes below are taken from the ‘Biography’ Database entry on Layard:
“Layard was a pioneer in the application of psychology to anthropology. W.H.R. Rivers had just finished his History of Melanesian Society, and wanted to investigate further some of the problems that remained outstanding. Took Layard to Atchin, off the coast of Malekula and left him there after a week without any adequate training for his research or guidance on how to cope with a trying tropical climate and tribes only recently tamed. It may be that some misunderstanding, or the outbreak of war, was the reason. Anyway, Layard returned to Australia to enlist in the war, but rejected, and ill, he now realised that he was so engrossed in the life and culture of the tribesmen that he must return. The twelve months or so he spent altogether in the field were probably the most rewarding time of his life; but in 1915 he returned to the UK suffering from serious nervous exhaustion. For the next 25 years, soon becoming an ethnologist to be reckoned with, he worked on his filed materials and on the comparative ethnology of Melanesia.”
A reproduction of this image was displayed in Collected Sights in the section Fieldwork and Scholarship with the descriptive label:
“William Rivers and a local teacher from Erakor (left) with a group of young men in front of an abandoned Roman Catholic Mission house. Rivers accompanied Layard to Vanuatu, staying only a few days before continuing survey work in island Melanesia. In contrast, Layard conducted intensive fieldwork on Atchin for a year.”
[Sudeshna Guha 27/11/02]
You can search the Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology catalogues and see the front end of this catalogue at
http://museum.archanth.cam.ac.uk/home/catalogue/index.htm
Please note a few things:
There is no first person or colloquial writing in the catalogue
All notes are sourced and referenced and authored
You might want to think about putting the following into the description field:
Source
Dimensions of object
any other ideas?
One thing I would like you to be thinking about as you work on the archive is what your 'ideal' museum catalogue would look like -what fields would it contain? How would it organise information. Please put any ideas into the comments section of this posting...