Theater Pedagogy
The theatrosphere has recently lit up with the current state of MFA theater programs. Tom Loughlin, who is on the SUNY Fredonia theater faculty, recently posted about his journey in getting an MFA. He states, “What is fundamentally wrong with the MFA system today is exactly what was wrong with it 27 years ago when I was an MFA candidate. Its only true market value lies in the fact that it is a terminal academic degree. Every college professor who has an MFA knows this in their heart, and yet MFA programs in this country by and large are simply unwilling to admit it. Beyond a handful of very exclusive and well-connected programs, it has very little value in the actual theatrical marketplace. Just ask the thousands of unemployed or underemployed actors out there with the degree.”
David Millstone responds in the comment section stating that he is glad that MFA programs do not focus on producing teachers and that, “an MFA heavy in pedagogy is best for punching out high school drama club leaders, not actors.”
Loughlin responds stating, “I wish more MFAs would concentrate on creating high-quality teachers of acting. The fact that MFA programs do NOT train their students to be good teachers is exactly why there are so many poor and uncommitted teachers in BFA and MFA programs (and I’d like to point out that this situation is not unique to theatre. As a professor I run into a lot of PhDs who are great scholars but lousy teachers). We need better and better-trained teachers of acting who can come up with fresh ideas about how to create a more sustainable theatre in this country. See the University of Pittsburgh’s MFA Program for an example of what I am talking about - it’s the best example I know of truth-in-advertising at the MFA level.”
I would ask the same question, why couldn’t MFA programs produce great actors and great teachers at the same time? Why do these two things have to be separated? What I am learning at NYU is that the two are not distant relatives, but closely connected. Our classes are filled with students who are artists and teachers. The first thing the professor said in our Shakespeare class is that the best way to teach Shakespeare is to experience the work in performance. So our first assignment was to perform twenty-five minutes of a play. The first half of the class was spent on skills an actor needs to perform Shakespeare, while the second part of the class was focused on how to take what we learned and coach students in performing. There was a balance of art and education. Many graduate programs place students in teaching roles without providing them with any training on what it means to be a teacher. The graduate students are prone to copy their own teacher, usually copying their teacher's bad habits. The graduate theater world needs to be honest with the state of the profession; there are more education jobs (and even those are hard to find) than performance jobs. So why not build a program that has a balance of acting skills and theater pedagogy?
All the hard work has finally come to the end. The Giver opens this Friday, February 20th. We have been in tech rehearsal the last couple of days and things are coming together.
The Educational Theater program is producing the play
Welcome to a new